Serveur d'exploration MERS

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

A review of the use of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to differentiate among cryptic Anopheles species

Identifieur interne : 003F96 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 003F95; suivant : 003F97

A review of the use of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to differentiate among cryptic Anopheles species

Auteurs : F. H. Collins [Géorgie (pays), États-Unis] ; S. M. Paskewitz [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : ISTEX:15FE73DA42757D47E1F07881FA61EDB505346A90

English descriptors

Abstract

Cryptic species complexes are groups of closely related species that are difficult or impossible to distinguish by morphological traits. These complexes are known from a wide variety of arthropods and are common among the well‐studied, medically‐important insects. For example, many of the anopheline vectors of malaria parasites are members of cryptic species complexes. Complexes typically include both vector and non‐vector species, and two or more member species are often found sympatrically. Until the late 1950s, only two such Anopheles complexes were known, the A. gambiae complex from Africa and the A. maculipennis complex from Europe. Today, dozens of Anopheles cryptic species complexes are recognized, and accumulating evidence suggests that most important malaria vectors are likely to be members of such complexes. A variety of methods have been developed for identifying the species of individual specimens from these complexes, although until recently only those based on species‐specific allozymes and polytene chromosome inversions were widely used. The limitations inherent in these methods have been circumvented with DNA‐based procedures, which are especially useful because both sexes and all developmental stages can be identified, and DNA can be recovered from samples stored by a wide variety of simple methods. Several DNA‐based identification techniques have been developed, including hybridization assays based on species‐specific repeat sequences, and diagnostic PCR fragments produced either by the use of random PCR primers or by amplifying DNA with primers based on known species‐specific sequences. In this review we discuss the relative merits of different methods of cryptic species identification, with emphasis on the use of ribosomal DNA as a target for species‐diagnostic PCR assays.

Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2583.1996.tb00034.x


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">A review of the use of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to differentiate among cryptic Anopheles species</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Collins, F H" sort="Collins, F H" uniqKey="Collins F" first="F. H." last="Collins">F. H. Collins</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Paskewitz, S M" sort="Paskewitz, S M" uniqKey="Paskewitz S" first="S. M." last="Paskewitz">S. M. Paskewitz</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:15FE73DA42757D47E1F07881FA61EDB505346A90</idno>
<date when="1996" year="1996">1996</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2583.1996.tb00034.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-QZ676DDX-X/fulltext.pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001C48</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001C48</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001C48</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">001733</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">001733</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0962-1075:1996:Collins F:a:review:of</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">004052</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">003F96</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">003F96</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title level="a" type="main">A review of the use of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to differentiate among cryptic Anopheles species</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Collins, F H" sort="Collins, F H" uniqKey="Collins F" first="F. H." last="Collins">F. H. Collins</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">Géorgie (pays)</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Division of Parasitic Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Chamblee</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Correspondence address: Division of Parasitic Diseases, Mailstop F22, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Chamblee, GA 30341</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>GA 30341</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Paskewitz, S M" sort="Paskewitz, S M" uniqKey="Paskewitz S" first="S. M." last="Paskewitz">S. M. Paskewitz</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<country xml:lang="fr">États-Unis</country>
<wicri:regionArea>*Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin</wicri:regionArea>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Wisconsin</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Insect Molecular Biology</title>
<title level="j" type="alt">INSECT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0962-1075</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1365-2583</idno>
<imprint>
<biblScope unit="vol">5</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="1">1</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="9">9</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope>
<publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="1996-02">1996-02</date>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">0962-1075</idno>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<idno type="ISSN">0962-1075</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en">
<term>Additional bases</term>
<term>Adult females</term>
<term>Anopheles</term>
<term>Anopheles albimanus</term>
<term>Anopheles gambiae</term>
<term>Anopheles gambiae species</term>
<term>Anopheles punctulatus</term>
<term>Anopheles species</term>
<term>Arabiensis</term>
<term>Assay</term>
<term>Blackwell science</term>
<term>Chromosome</term>
<term>Collins</term>
<term>Copy number</term>
<term>Cryptic</term>
<term>Cryptic sibling species</term>
<term>Cryptic species</term>
<term>Cryptic species complexes</term>
<term>Cryptic species identification</term>
<term>Culicidae</term>
<term>Della torre</term>
<term>Diagnostic assays</term>
<term>Diagnostic sequences</term>
<term>Different methods</term>
<term>Different sizes</term>
<term>Different species</term>
<term>Diptera</term>
<term>Disease control</term>
<term>Exonuclease activity</term>
<term>Functional analysis</term>
<term>Gambiae</term>
<term>Gene regions</term>
<term>Important malaria vectors</term>
<term>Intergenic spacers</term>
<term>Interspecies variation</term>
<term>Intraspecies variation</term>
<term>Intraspecific</term>
<term>Intraspecific variation</term>
<term>Its2</term>
<term>Its2 region</term>
<term>Its2 sequences</term>
<term>Large number</term>
<term>Length variation</term>
<term>Lnsect</term>
<term>Lnsect disease vectors</term>
<term>Major differences</term>
<term>Malaria</term>
<term>Malaria control</term>
<term>Mating incompatibility</term>
<term>Mismatch</term>
<term>Mosquito</term>
<term>Mosquito species</term>
<term>Nucleotide</term>
<term>Other hand</term>
<term>Parasitic diseases</term>
<term>Paskewitz</term>
<term>Personal communication</term>
<term>Polymerase</term>
<term>Polymerase chain reaction</term>
<term>Polymorphic</term>
<term>Polymorphism</term>
<term>Polytene</term>
<term>Polytene chromosomes</term>
<term>Porter collins</term>
<term>Primer</term>
<term>Primer extension</term>
<term>Proc natl acad</term>
<term>Rdna</term>
<term>Rdna locus</term>
<term>Recent developments</term>
<term>Ribosomal</term>
<term>Sequence analysis</term>
<term>Sibling</term>
<term>Sibling species</term>
<term>Spacer</term>
<term>Species complexes</term>
<term>Species identification</term>
<term>Strand primers</term>
<term>Such complexes</term>
<term>Terminal base</term>
<term>Wesson</term>
<term>Wide variety</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Cryptic species complexes are groups of closely related species that are difficult or impossible to distinguish by morphological traits. These complexes are known from a wide variety of arthropods and are common among the well‐studied, medically‐important insects. For example, many of the anopheline vectors of malaria parasites are members of cryptic species complexes. Complexes typically include both vector and non‐vector species, and two or more member species are often found sympatrically. Until the late 1950s, only two such Anopheles complexes were known, the A. gambiae complex from Africa and the A. maculipennis complex from Europe. Today, dozens of Anopheles cryptic species complexes are recognized, and accumulating evidence suggests that most important malaria vectors are likely to be members of such complexes. A variety of methods have been developed for identifying the species of individual specimens from these complexes, although until recently only those based on species‐specific allozymes and polytene chromosome inversions were widely used. The limitations inherent in these methods have been circumvented with DNA‐based procedures, which are especially useful because both sexes and all developmental stages can be identified, and DNA can be recovered from samples stored by a wide variety of simple methods. Several DNA‐based identification techniques have been developed, including hybridization assays based on species‐specific repeat sequences, and diagnostic PCR fragments produced either by the use of random PCR primers or by amplifying DNA with primers based on known species‐specific sequences. In this review we discuss the relative merits of different methods of cryptic species identification, with emphasis on the use of ribosomal DNA as a target for species‐diagnostic PCR assays.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>Géorgie (pays)</li>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Wisconsin</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="Géorgie (pays)">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Collins, F H" sort="Collins, F H" uniqKey="Collins F" first="F. H." last="Collins">F. H. Collins</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
<country name="États-Unis">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Collins, F H" sort="Collins, F H" uniqKey="Collins F" first="F. H." last="Collins">F. H. Collins</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Paskewitz, S M" sort="Paskewitz, S M" uniqKey="Paskewitz S" first="S. M." last="Paskewitz">S. M. Paskewitz</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/MersV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003F96 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 003F96 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    MersV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     ISTEX:15FE73DA42757D47E1F07881FA61EDB505346A90
   |texte=   A review of the use of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) to differentiate among cryptic Anopheles species
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33.
Data generation: Mon Apr 20 23:26:43 2020. Site generation: Sat Mar 27 09:06:09 2021